With some plugins (which is the most beutiful plugin manager I've ever seen in a project I reccon) it really was a kick ass application. When I was switching to Linux I was doing more html than C++ and a note should be said, jedit is superb for editing html.
I have nothing bad to say about jedit really, it worked really well for me in a while, but there is only so much time you are willing to spwnd within a text editor (although graphical) until you want to use a IDE instead.
I used emacs and vi for some part at university but I always found it a bit of going a step back towards DOS, where I really kicked ass with basic, pascal, c++ (watcom) and assembler a few years back. Since I'm a fanboy of the GUI's and haven't really got fond of emacs (which I understand that you can be very much, so please don't flame me). When I first came to the linux world, I basicly only knew of vi, emacs and jedit.
#JGRASP GCC NOT FOUND WINDOWS#
I'm a ex windows user btw, if that should bring some clearity when I make references. I'm a fairly new user to linux, I've been around for soon two years, but I've grown to be a permanent user and I've tried different distros and IDE's, and I guess I could post a bit about the IDE´s (basicly I've gone from red hat 9 suse -> mandrake ->, and I will probably switch to ubuntu linux at some stage, perhaps then next release is out, supporting x.org). XEmacs and Emacs are pretty much the same system, normal Emacs runs in a window too when started in X (or MS Windows) these days. * Your hands do not have to leave the main part of the keyboard - ever
* Self-documenting (once you figure out the self-documentation system) * Support for editing lots of different languages and doing other stuff - if not out-of-box then with third party modules * Contains it's own scripting language -> can be extended * Many third-party modules are quite buggy * Integration with compiling and debugging is less seamless than in more modern IDE's * Emacs lisp (scripting language) is rather weird for people who are not used to lisp * Bloated (was more of an issue 10 years ago, it is fast enough on anything made in the last 4 years) * Hundreds of keyboard shortcuts to remember - steep learning curve I can review emacs/xemacs although I'm not sure I'm entirely objective.Īnyway, people seem to either love or hate emacs, I'll list the arguments on both sides:
#JGRASP GCC NOT FOUND SOFTWARE#
Personal edition is available for free.Ī lightweight development environment, created specifically to provide automatic generation of software visualizations It is more aimed towards Java development but it also has support for C++ development.Ī crossplatform C++ IDE (Windows and GNU/Linux).Ī crossplatform C++ IDE. Part of the KDE project.Ī crossplatform C++ IDE (Windows and GNU/Linux), but unfortunately the development has halted.Ī crossplatform Java-based IDE. QT-based C++ IDE (syntax highlighting for other languages). And just in case: Please, don't start any flamewars such as "vi vs. NOTE: Let me know if you have any other IDEs to add. Here's a short summary of the most popular ones. Alright, there have been A LOT of posts of different IDEs for Linux.
0 kommentar(er)
